Welfare states and social policy in the EU multi-level system
Dynamics of change and persistence – and of far-reaching politicisation
…in national welfare states and social policy
The more heterogeneous a state’s society becomes, the more its welfare system comes potentially under strain: social policy has a key function in determining who belongs to a community and who does not. Particularly in times of economic strain and of political polarisation, the arenas where politics of social inclusion and exclusion are made become battlefields for contestation on larger political and societal questions.
These circumstances form the context and red thread of my research on national-level social policymaking and welfare-state reform or persistence. I study political regulation and politicisation processes with a particular focus on vulnerable/vulnerabilised and marginalised target groups of social policy, such as forced migrants (see my specific research project on the nexus of migration, incorporation and health policies), women*, children and youth, and elderly. My research examines primarily the welfare states and social policies of Germany and Sweden, but also includes broader comparisons among European states.
…in EU social policy
The EU’s social policy differs in many respects from conventional definitions of (national) social policy, being principally regulatory and to a significant extent governed through soft-law mechanisms, whereas the power to decide upon distribution schemes remains in member states’ hands. Whereas the European Communities had very limited and fragmentary competences in the area of social policy to begin with, the social dimension of European integration expanded significantly already in the 1950s to 1980s, notably through different soft-law mechanisms such as action programmes and recommendations, and through the supranational activism of, amongst others, the Commission, the European Court of Justice, and notably the European Parliament.
In my research on EU-level social policy, I study the emergence of a European social dimension from a historical-sociological institutionalist approach, with a special focus on the ideas influencing actors’ behaviour: the area of social policy provided a stronger ideational dimension than any other Community policy area at the time. Through the promotion of European social policy measures, Members of the European Parliament as well as various actors within the Commission sought to present European integration as a project with a palpable positive impact on people’s lives. They hoped thus to increase public support for closer European integration (as well as their own related political actions), and to convince the member states’ citizens that the Communities were more than a mere technocratic, market-oriented construct. The emergence of a European-level social policy is thus closely linked to questions of democratic representation in and legitimacy of EU governance.
Publications
- Access to healthcare by migrants. In Joel Faintuch & Salomão Faintuch (eds.), Business Ethics in the Healthcare Industry, Springer (2025, forthcoming).
- Die Grundrente im Spiegel der Machtressourcentheorie (co-authored with Veit Winkler). Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 2025 (forthcoming).
- The European Parliament and the COVID-19 crisis (co-authored with Francis Jacobs). Journal of Legislative Studies, 31:2 (2025), pp. 428-454, https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2024.2443879.
- Von vagen Visionen zu klaren Rechten. Wie das frühe Europäische Parlament das Gebiet der Gleichstellungspolitik und damit die soziale Dimension europäischer Integration prägte. CLIO – Themenportal Europäische Geschichte, 2025.
- The EU as Active and Passive Political Determinant of Forced Migrants’ Health: Insights from the Case of Germany. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 49:5 (2024), pp. 721–741.
- Study: The European Parliament and the Origins of Social Policy. European Parliamentary Research Service, European Parliament, March 2024.
- Briefing: The European Parliament and the origins of social policy. European Parliamentary Research Service, European Parliament, February 2024.
- Different Systems, Similar Responses: Policy Reforms on Asylum-Seekers’ and Refugees’ Access to Healthcare in Germany and Sweden in the Wake of the 2015-17 ‘Migration Crisis’. In Mari-Liis Jakobson et al. (eds.), Anxieties of Migration and Integration in Turbulent Times, Springer (2023), pp. 129-146.
- Regimewandel oder -beständigkeit in Krisenzeiten? Die politische Regulierung des Gesundheitszugangs Geflüchteter in Deutschland während der Migrations[management]krise. Sozialer Fortschritt, 72 (2023), pp. 635-652.
- Inequality by design: The politics behind forced migrants’ access to healthcare. Medical Law Review, 30:4 (2022), pp. 658-679.
- The Parliamentary Roots of European Social Policy: Turning Talk into Power. Palgrave Macmillan (2021).
- The European Parliament’s youth policy, 1952-1979. An attempt to create a collective memory of an integrated Europe. Politique européenne, 71:1 (2021), pp. 28-52.
- The Strategic Involvement of the European Parliament in Establishing the European Social Fund. In Paul Stephenson et al. (eds.): Financial Accountability in the European Union: Institutions, Policy and Practice, London/New York: Routledge (2021), pp. 41-56.
- A Parliament for the People? – The European Parliament’s Activism in the Area of Social Policy from the early 1970s to the Single European Act. Journal of European Integration History, 27:1 (2021), pp. 37-56.
- The impact of national values on health-care provisions for asylum seekers and refugees in Germany and Sweden. DPCE Online, 45:4 (2021), pp. 5208-5225.
- La politique du Parlement européen sur l’égalité des sexes avant 1979: une réussite inattendue. In Anne-Laure Briatte et al. (eds.): L’Europe, une chance pour les femmes? Le genre de la construction européenne, Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne (2019), pp. 105-114.
